"Global jobless to hit record 200 million this year: ILO"

[dumbass]

Originally Posted by Aerro424

I'm saying you are throwing raw numbers out there with no context, AND you are leaving out the fact that it's not the president who creates jobs. Since I've already mentioned those two things along with the fact the the GOP has been blocking everything the president has been trying to do, especially those things that would help the job market it becomes obvious that you are just trying to live up to your name.

So I'm helipng you. Not that you need it.

Highlighted above, in two consecutive sentences within the same paragraph you state two differing facts diametrically opposed to each other. You first say that it is a "fact that it is not the president who creates jobs.". Than in the very next sentence you say "the fact the the GOP has been blocking everything the president has been trying to do, especially those things that would help the job market".

You can't have "FACTS" are in conflict with one another. Either he creates jobs or he doesn't. You can't have it both ways.

[Francoitalianarmy]

Originally Posted by dumbass

Highlighted above, in two consecutive sentences within the same paragraph you state two differing facts diametrically opposed to each other. You first say that it is a "fact that it is not the president who creates jobs.". Than in the very next sentence you say "the fact the the GOP has been blocking everything the president has been trying to do, especially those things that would help the job market".

You can't have "FACTS" are in conflict with one another. Either he creates jobs or he doesn't. You can't have it both ways.

Not to mention his bitching about you giving raw numbers but disregarding the fact you posted a link for them...lol

[Aerro424]

Originally Posted by dumbass

Highlighted above, in two consecutive sentences within the same paragraph you state two differing facts diametrically opposed to each other. You first say that it is a "fact that it is not the president who creates jobs.". Than in the very next sentence you say "the fact the the GOP has been blocking everything the president has been trying to do, especially those things that would help the job market".

You can't have "FACTS" are in conflict with one another. Either he creates jobs or he doesn't. You can't have it both ways.

I never said he actually CREATES jobs, I said there are bills that HELP THE JOB MARKET. There IS a difference.

[dumbass]

Originally Posted by Aerro424

I never said he actually CREATES jobs, I said there are bills that HELP THE JOB MARKET. There IS a difference.

But you sure as hell said it's a fact that he doesn't create jobs and that it's a fact that he's trying to create jobs. Which is it. You still can't have it both ways.

Obviously you never took dancing lessons. Your rendition of the Liberal Tap Dance leaves a lot to be desired. How many times has about every Democrat above the rank of the mayor of a village bragged about the number of jobs "SAVED OR CREATED" by this president, including his own Office of The President it's self. Even you say he wants to do more but those Republican bastards block his efforts.

I don't expect you to actually read the following report but spend the time to examine the official Seal on the first page and fast forward to the about page 47 where they summarize their "ESTIMATES" of the number of jobs "CREATED OR SAVED" that The President has taken credit for.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/docu...rra_report.pdf

P.S. Here's another link form PolitiFact that also shows that Obama said that he was creating jobs.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...on-green-jobs/

[dumbass]

Originally Posted by Francoitalianarmy

Not to mention his bitching about you giving raw numbers but disregarding the fact you posted a link for them...lol

I've posted the same link every month this year but it seems that facts always take a back seat to his liberal speaking points. It's typically his MO to make a lot of diversionary noise without actually addressing the "FACTS" of the subject.